<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jury orders Target to pay $3 million in civil case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanbadbusinesslist.com/jury-orders-target-to-pay-3-million-in-civil-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanbadbusinesslist.com/jury-orders-target-to-pay-3-million-in-civil-case/</link>
	<description>Bad Business and Rip Off reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sloane</title>
		<link>http://www.americanbadbusinesslist.com/jury-orders-target-to-pay-3-million-in-civil-case/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>sloane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanbadbusinesslist.com/?p=78#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Luckily for Target, it have a new advertising campaign in place that has already received full approval from Dr. Tantillo (&#039;the marketing doctor&#039;), a frequent guest on Box Business News.

Target&#039;s new advertising campaign will absorb a full 3/4 of their marketing budget (at least according to the post on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; the Marketing Doctor&#039;s blog&lt;/a&gt;). The campaign will emphasize Target&#039;s addition of more perishables and will fight against the perception that their products cost more than those of Wal-Mart and Kmart, including actual prices of products in their ads. ( I&#039;m not sure I totally believe it that Target costs doesn&#039;t cost a tad more than Walmart or Target..but maybe this just means that dirtier, more disorganized stores with frumpier staff spells VALUE to me). 

&quot;The instinct in tough times might be to cut marketing dollars.  Bad idea.  Smarter marketing is needed now, not less marketing.&quot;

With this little wrench, it looks like Target will definitely need that image-building campaign..

 &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/10/24/value-for-money-is-back--target-does-marketing-right.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tantillo&#039;s full post &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily for Target, it have a new advertising campaign in place that has already received full approval from Dr. Tantillo (&#8216;the marketing doctor&#8217;), a frequent guest on Box Business News.</p>
<p>Target&#8217;s new advertising campaign will absorb a full 3/4 of their marketing budget (at least according to the post on the <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv" rel="nofollow"> the Marketing Doctor&#8217;s blog</a>). The campaign will emphasize Target&#8217;s addition of more perishables and will fight against the perception that their products cost more than those of Wal-Mart and Kmart, including actual prices of products in their ads. ( I&#8217;m not sure I totally believe it that Target costs doesn&#8217;t cost a tad more than Walmart or Target..but maybe this just means that dirtier, more disorganized stores with frumpier staff spells VALUE to me). </p>
<p>&#8220;The instinct in tough times might be to cut marketing dollars.  Bad idea.  Smarter marketing is needed now, not less marketing.&#8221;</p>
<p>With this little wrench, it looks like Target will definitely need that image-building campaign..</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/10/24/value-for-money-is-back--target-does-marketing-right.aspx" rel="nofollow">Tantillo&#8217;s full post </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
